I\/We oppose any weakening of the HOME RULE; I\/We OPPOSE the addition of Article 13-E, SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT to the General Municipal Law.<\/p>\n
Removing Home Rule for this issue will set a precedent that other corporations and entities will use to exempt themselves from LOCAL INPUT and LOCAL GOVERNANCE. THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.<\/p>\n
EMF has been labeled by the World Health Organization as a Class 2B carcinogen along side asbestos, lead, DDT, and more. EMF is the only Class 2B Carcinogen that is allowed to blanket our environment with no oversight or regulation – for the sake of the “convenience” of wifi devices. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE and UNACCEPTABLE. The Public is becoming more informed of this public health assault – despite what the industry claims.<\/p>\n
WIFI Radiation from 5G is magnitudes worse than existing wifi. WE DON’T NEED IT, WE DON’T WANT IT, WE KNOW IT IS DESTRUCTIVE TO BIOLOGICAL TISSUES, insects, birds, reptiles, amphibians, even PLANTS and trees. Putting a cell phone next to a bee hive kills all the bees. (http:\/\/www.electronicsilentspring.com\/primers\/wildlife\/wireless-devices-wildlife\/<\/a>). Killing our bees and insects means NO CROPS WILL GROW. 5G and the RF EMF HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN SAFE TO HUMANITY, WILDLIFE, INSECT LIFE! Radiation affects children more than adults; the FCC’s standards of safety are an industry-insider JOKE.<\/p>\n RF EMF Radiation is the next DDT, Asbestos, Lead, Thalidimide, Smoking… The Small Cell Towers, and smart meters are not safe, and the industry knows it. NO TO WEAKENING HOME RULE. NO to Article 13-E in the General Municipal Law.<\/p>\n *** Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G. 5G Appeal.\u00a0https:\/\/ehtrust.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G We the undersigned, more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. (Note: Blue links below are references.)<\/p>\n 5G leads to massive increase of mandatory exposure to wireless radiation<\/p>\n 5G technology is effective only over short distance. It is poorly transmitted through solid material. Many new antennas will be required and full-scale implementation will result in antennas every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas, thus massively increasing mandatory exposure.<\/p>\n With \u201dthe ever more extensive use of wireless technologies,\u201d nobody can avoid to be exposed. Because on top of the increased number of 5G-transmitters (even within housing, shops and in hospitals) according to estimates, \u201d10 to 20 billion connections\u201d (to refrigerators, washing machines, surveillance cameras, self-driving cars and buses, etc.) will be parts of the Internet of Things. All these together can cause a substantial increase in the total, long term RF-EMF exposure to all EU citizens.<\/p>\n Harmful effects of RF-EMF exposure are already proven<\/p>\n More than 230 scientists from 41 countries have expressed their \u201cserious concerns\u201d regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that \u201dnumerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines\u201d. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.<\/p>\n After the scientists\u2019 appeal was written in 2015 additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF-EMF fields from wireless technology. The world\u2019s largest study (25 million US dollar) National Toxicology Program (NTP), shows statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines followed by most countries. These results support results in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumour risk. A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reports demonstrate harm to human health from EMFs.<\/p>\n The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz \u2013 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). However, new studies like the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks confirm that RF-EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.<\/p>\n The EUROPA EM-EMF Guideline 2016 states that \u201dthere is strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, and male infertility\u2026Common EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) symptoms include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms.\u201d<\/p>\n An increasing part of the European population is affected by ill health symptoms that have for many years been linked to exposure to EMF and wireless radiation in the scientific literature. The International Scientific Declaration on EHS & multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels 2015, declares that: “In view of our present scientific knowledge, we thereby stress all national and international bodies and institutions…to recognize EHS and MCS as true medical conditions which acting as sentinel diseases may create a major public health concern in years to come worldwide i.e. in all the countries implementing unrestricted use of electromagnetic field-based wireless technologies and marketed chemical substances\u2026 Inaction is a cost to society and is not an option anymore\u2026 we unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health\u2026that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective.”<\/p>\n Precautions Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): \u201dTake all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people who seem to be most at risk from head tumours\u2026Assembly strongly recommends that the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle is applied, covering both the socalled thermal effects and the athermic [non-thermal] or biological effects of electromagnetic emissions or radiation\u201d and to \u201dimprove risk-assessment standards and quality\u201d.<\/p>\n The Nuremberg code (1949) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the roll-out of 5G with new, higher RF-EMF exposure. All such experiments: \u201dshould be based on previous knowledge (e.g., an expectation derived from animal experiments) that justifies the experiment. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.\u201d (Nuremberg code pts 3-5). Already published scientific studies show that there is \u201da priori reason to believe\u201d in real health hazards.<\/p>\n The European Environment Agency (EEA) is warning for \u201dRadiation risk from everyday devices” in spite of the radiation being below the WHO\/ICNIRP standards. EEA also concludes: \u201dThere are many examples of the failure to use the precautionary principle in the past, which have resulted in serious and often irreversible damage to health and environments\u2026harmful exposures can be widespread before there is both ‘convincing’ evidence of harm from long-term exposures, and biological understanding [mechanism] of how that harm is caused.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSafety guidelines\u201d protect industry \u2013 not health<\/p>\n The current ICNIRP \u201dsafety guidelines\u201d are obsolete. All proofs of harm mentioned above arise although the radiation is below the ICNIRP “safety guidelines”. Therefore new safety standards are necessary. The reason for the misleading guidelines is that \u201cconflict of interest of ICNIRP members due to their relationships with telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation\u2026To evaluate cancer risks it is necessary to include scientists with competence in medicine, especially oncology.\u201d<\/p>\n The current ICNIRP\/WHO guidelines for EMF are based on the obsolete hypothesis that \u201dThe critical effect of RF-EMF exposure relevant to human health and safety is heating of exposed tissue.\u201d However, scientists have proven that many different kinds of illnesses and harms are caused without heating (\u201dnonthermal effect\u201d) at radiation levels well below ICNIRP guidelines.<\/p>\n Taffy Williams Member, Board of Directors New York State Department of Environmental Conservation I\/We oppose any weakening of the HOME RULE; I\/We OPPOSE the addition of Article 13-E, SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT to the General Municipal Law. Removing Home Rule for this issue will set a precedent that other corporations and entities will use to exempt themselves from LOCAL INPUT and LOCAL GOVERNANCE. THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. EMF has … Continue reading NY4WHALES\/NY4WILDLIFE LETTER TO NYS SENATE LEADERSHIP – OPPOSING 13-E WHICH EXEMPTS UTILITY COMPANIES FROM LOCAL ZONING AND GOVERNANCE LAW FOR 5G SMALL CELL NETWORK SITE DEPLOYMENT<\/span>
\nWe will end up in a world without insects. We already have almost no insects – the primary food of much of our bird species. What will this 5G do? Let’s not wait and find out!<\/p>\n
\nShall we go on? Shall we wait for the clusters of cancers to appear on every street? Then who will be to blame? How about the LEGISLATORS that allowed this to happen.<\/p>\n
\n180 SCIENTISTS CALL FOR A MORATORIUM ON THE 5G ROLLOUT<\/p>\n
\nSeptember 13, 2017<\/p>\n
\nThe Precautionary Principle (UNESCO) was adopted by EU 2005: \u201dWhen human activities may lead to morally unacceptable harm that is scientifically plausible but uncertain, actions shall be taken to avoid or diminish that harm.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nNY4Whales.org\/NY4Wildlife.org
\nYonkers, NY 10707 USA
\n914-793-9186<\/span>
\nA 501(c)(3) non-profit for whales and wildlife
\nFollow\/Tweet @ny4whales<\/p>\n
\nCetacean Society International<\/p>\n
\nUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service
\nLicensed Wildlife Rehabilitator
\nFAA Certified Remote Pilot
\nny4whales@optonline.net<\/span>
\n914-793-9186<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"